Ayurveda vs allopathy - #3130
I’ve always been curious about the differences between ayurveda vs allopathy, especially for treating chronic conditions. Can someone explain how they compare in terms of approach, effectiveness, and side effects? For example, I’ve been managing joint pain for years, and while allopathic painkillers give quick relief, I’m worried about long-term side effects. On the other hand, I’ve heard that Ayurveda focuses on treating the root cause but takes longer. Is this accurate? If you’ve tried both Ayurveda vs allopathy for a condition like arthritis, which worked better for you? Did you feel that one approach was more holistic than the other? I’d also love to hear about the cost and convenience of treatments in Ayurveda vs allopathy.
On the Ask Ayurveda service, online consultations with Ayurvedic doctors for General Medicine are available for any issue that concerns you. Expert doctors provide consultations around the clock and for free. Ask your question and get an answer right away!
Doctors’ responses
If you need a detailed answer, ask the Ayurvedic doctor your question
The Ayurvedic doctor will answer all of your questions, advise you what to do now to get better, what to do in the future, what Ayurvedic treatments and practices should be followed.
About our doctors
Only qualified ayurvedic doctors who have confirmed the availability of medical education and other certificates of medical practice consult on our service.